Most teams don't have a "sales problem".
They have a systems and resourcing problem that shows up as:
SDRs drowning in manual research
Frankensteined tools that don't talk to each other
Great campaigns running on top of bad data
Pipeline that spikes when an agency shows up... then flatlines when they leave
Clay has exploded in popularity because it fixes a lot of this on paper: enrichment, research, triggers, and automation in one place.
That's why "Clay sales automation agencies" are suddenly everywhere.
But here's the question that actually matters:
Do you need another agency to run Clay campaigns for you... or a revenue system built on Clay, with an embedded team that runs it with you?
At Intelligent Resourcing, we're not a Clay agency. We're an Ops Studio that uses Clay as one of the core building blocks of your GTM operating system, and we back it with global, embedded delivery teams.
This article will help you:
Understand what Clay really is (and isn't) in a GTM stack
See the limits of traditional Clay agencies
Use a simple framework to evaluate partners
Decide when you need an Ops Studio
Clay's Real Role in Modern GTM
Clay as the Central Data & Automation Layer
Clay isn't "just another enrichment tool".
Used properly, Clay becomes a GTM control layer that sits across:
Data enrichment – combining multiple providers into one clean record
Prospect research – pulling context from the open web and niche sources
Signals & intent – tracking who's hiring, raising, launching, or engaging
Workflow automation – orchestrating what happens next, and where
When Clay is integrated into your stack, it can:
Feed clean, enriched data into your CRM
Trigger outbound sequences when specific events happen
Score and route inbound leads to the right rep
Provide one source of truth for your TAM, active pipeline, and high-intent opportunities
But Clay is a layer. It's not your GTM strategy. It's not your team. That's where most Clay sales automation conversations go wrong.
Why Everyone Is Suddenly Talking About "Clay Agencies"
If you've searched for anything like "Clay sales automation agency", you've seen the pattern:
Top 10 lists of "best Clay agencies"
Every agency now "Clay-native" overnight
Lots of screenshots of Clay tables and clever workflows
The narrative is simple:
"Give us Clay access, we'll build campaigns, and your outbound will magically scale."
That can work for a while. But if Clay is just powering campaigns, not systems, you're still left with:
No internal ownership
No embedded capability
No scalable operating model
And you're back to "Which agency do we hire next?"
The Limits of Traditional Clay Sales Automation Agencies
Clay agencies are good at what they're designed to do. The problem is what they're not designed to own.
Campaign-First, System-Second
Most Clay agencies optimise for campaign performance:
Multi-channel outbound
Clever AI personalisation
Tight intent-driven triggers
What they rarely own end-to-end:
Your data model and governance
Your RevOps architecture
Your hiring and resourcing model around the system
So your outbound improves... while the rest of your GTM remains a mess.
Tool Stack Overload Without Ownership
A common pattern:
Agency brings in Clay + 6 other tools
They build intricate scrapers, webhooks, and playbooks
They run everything from their own docs and dashboards
Then:
Your internal team sees "magic happening somewhere"
Nothing is properly documented in your world
When the contract ends, so does the magic
You haven't built an asset. You've rented a clever rig you don't really understand.
Where This Leaves GTM Leaders
As a founder, CRO, or Head of RevOps, that leaves you:
Dependent on external operators for every change
With very limited ability to run your own experiments
Constantly fighting to answer basic questions like:
"What's our actual TAM?"
"How big is our high-intent universe right now?"
"What's the ROI of this Clay spend?"
It's not a tooling problem. It's an operating model problem.
A Smarter Way to Think About Clay Partners
Before you ask "Which Clay agency is best?", it's worth asking: What type of partner do we actually need?
The Four Dimensions That Actually Matter
Use this lens for any Clay partner conversation:
1. GTM Strategy & ICP Design
Can they rebuild your ICPs from the ground up?
Do they challenge you on who you shouldn't target?
2. Data & Enrichment Architecture
Can they design tables, fields, and pipelines that actually reflect your GTM reality?
Do they think in systems (sources, freshness, quality, governance)?
3. Workflow & Integration Engineering
Can they architect how Clay talks to your CRM, marketing tools, inboxes, and reporting layer?
Or do they just wire Clay into whatever's already there and hope for the best?
4. Talent & Ownership
Who actually runs this thing in month 3, 6, 18?
Do you get an embedded team who live in your environment, or a deck at the end of the project?
The 3 Main Types of Clay Partners You'll Meet
1. Campaign Agencies
Strength: outbound creativity, copy, channels
Weakness: shallow on ops, data, and long-term ownership
2. Implementation Shops
Strength: technical Clay builds, workflows, and integrations
Weakness: often light on GTM strategy and commercial thinking
3. Ops Studios with Intelligent Resourcing (our camp)
Strength: design revenue systems, not just campaigns
Combine Clay GTM engineering
If you're scaling a serious GTM organisation, you typically outgrow types 1 and 2. You need type 3.
How Intelligent Resourcing Uses Clay to Build Revenue Systems
We built Intelligent Resourcing around a simple belief:
Revenue is a systems problem. Tools and headcount only matter when they sit inside the right operating model.
Clay is one of our favourite levers, but it's always part of a bigger design.
Intelligent Resourcing ≠ Agency. We're an Ops Studio.
Where a Clay agency says, "We'll run your outbound," we say:
We'll diagnose your GTM system – funnel, segments, motion, tech, constraints
We'll design the operating model – how data, signals, and people move together
We'll implement Clay as the control layer – not as a one-off campaign machine
We'll embed a global team – trained to run and evolve that system with you
That combination (Ops Studio + Intelligent Resourcing) is the difference.
You don't just get workflows. You get capability.
Our Clay-Powered Revenue Engine Framework
1. Diagnose & Design
We start with a working session that maps:
Your ICPs, segments, and deal cycles
Your current tools, data sources, and blind spots
The gaps between how you sell today and how you want to sell
From there, we define:
The buyer signals that actually matter in your world
The data model we need Clay to hold
The handoffs between marketing, SDRs, AEs, CS, and ops
You get a GTM architecture, not just "some Clay tables".
2. Architect & Implement in Clay
Next, we turn Clay into the GTM brain:
Build tables that reflect your TAM, active demand, and customers
Connect your CRMs, enrichment vendors, intent feeds, and comms tools
Set up workflows that:
Enrich and score accounts
Trigger outbound based on specific events
Route the right opportunities to the right reps
We don't chase "fancy for the sake of fancy". Every workflow must tie back to pipeline, velocity, or efficiency.
3. Embed an Intelligent Resourcing Pod
This is where we stop being like a typical consultancy.
We don't walk away after implementation. We build and embed a pod:
Clay/GTM engineer
Data & enrichment analyst
Ops / coordination support
They:
Maintain and evolve Clay workflows
Run experiments and report on impact
Handle the operational load your internal team shouldn't carry
They operate inside your stack, with our standards.
According to research on sales automation, teams using AI-driven automation tools experience a 33% increase in overall efficiency, and organisations implementing automated sales engagement platforms see an 11% improvement in sales cycle efficiency alongside a 27% boost in customer engagement.
4. Scale & Govern
As the system matures, we:
Add new signals, segments, and plays
Tighten governance: documentation, alerting, SLAs
Link Clay data into your reporting and revops rhythms
The outcome isn't "we have Clay running". The outcome is: we have a revenue engine with a team that knows how to run it.
Where Clay Sales Automation Agencies Still Make Sense
We're opinionated, but we're not dogmatic.
There are situations where a classic Clay agency is enough.
When a Classic "Clay Agency" Is Probably Fine
If you are:
Early-stage
Single market, single ICP
Just trying to prove outbound can work
...then a sharp Clay agency that can spin up outbound quickly may be the right first move.
You don't need an entire GTM operating model on day one.
When You've Outgrown the Agency Model
You know you've outgrown "just an agency" when:
You're selling into multiple segments or geos
You've got SDRs drowning in admin and CRM clean-up
Leadership is asking real questions about CAC, efficiency, and coverage
Every "new campaign" feels like another layer of complexity on top of an already fragile system
At that stage, bolting on more agencies is like adding turbines to a plane mid-flight. What you need is a better airframe.
That's where an Ops Studio + Intelligent Resourcing model is more powerful than a traditional agency relationship.
Build In-House, Hire an Agency, or Partner with Intelligent Resourcing?
Here's the honest comparison.
Option 1: Build In-House
Pros:
Full control
Deep company context
Long-term capability (if you can keep people)
Cons:
Hiring Clay + GTM + ops talent is hard and expensive
You still need people who know how to design the system
Risk of key-person dependency
Option 2: Hire a Clay Sales Automation Agency
Pros:
Faster to launch campaigns
Low upfront complexity
Often good for small, focused experiments
Cons:
Limited ownership of data and systems
Campaign-first thinking, not GTM-first
Ongoing dependency; hard to internalise the capability
Option 3: Ops Studio + Intelligent Resourcing (Our Model)
Pros:
GTM system designed end-to-end, with Clay as a central layer
You build institutional capability without building a massive in-house ops headcount
Cons:
More strategic than "just run some campaigns"
Best suited for teams that are ready to think in systems, not just tactics
If your ambition is "more meetings next month", an agency can do the job. If your ambition is "a durable, scalable revenue engine", you probably need something else.
Research shows that 75% of companies report that sales automation directly contributes to revenue growth, with organisations implementing automation seeing up to a 10-20% increase in ROI.
So... Do You Really Need a Clay Sales Automation Agency?
Maybe.
But more often, what you actually need is:
A GTM architecture that makes sense of your data, segments, and signals
A Clay-powered operating layer that sits across your stack
An embedded team who live inside that system with you, not outside it
That's what we build.
We use Clay extensively. We're fans of the ecosystem. We just refuse to pretend that "Clay + agency" is the whole answer.
What to Do Next
If any of this feels uncomfortably familiar, there are two simple next steps:
1. Map your Clay-powered revenue engine
We'll walk your funnel, tech, and data flows
We'll show you where Clay should sit, and where your current operating model is leaking revenue
2. Design your Intelligent Resourcing
We'll define the responsibilities and workflows needed to run your system
You get a clear view of how to move from "we run campaigns on Clay" to "we run our GTM on Clay"
You don't need another clever campaign.
You need a system (and a team) that makes Clay a structural advantage, not just a shiny tool.
Contact us to get started.
Related reading:
